Showing posts with label Movie Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie Review. Show all posts

Thursday, March 10, 2022

Movie Review: Room at the Top

Room at the Top is about a young man named Joe Lampton (Laurence Harvey). He is a World War II UK veteran who spent much of the war in a prison camp. The movie opens with him arriving at his new job in Warnley (I believe this is a fictional city in the UK). He is working at the Treasurer's Department for the city. Moving to Warnley is an upgrade for the young man as he previously grew up in the city of Dufton, which is a factory town while Warnley is a more vibrant city. He is an attractive young man and all the women in the office look at him with keen interest. They may have an interest in him, but he has no interest in them. Instead, his eyes turn to Susan Brown (Heather Sears). Why? Because her father is one of the wealthiest men in the city. She is involved in the theater and so he joins that theater group in order to gain her attention. The problem is that she is dating someone named Jack Wales (John Westbrook). Jack Wales is of the same social class as the Brown family and if the two marry there will be a combination of these two wealthy families. 

As Joe begins to gain Susan's attention, the Brown family goes about trying to figure out a subtle way to break up the potential couple. First, what appears to be a random job opportunity pops up for Joe, which would provide him opportunity for a solid career in accounting. The job so happens to be back in his hometown of Dufton. He learns by accident that the Brown family set him up for the job and so he turns it down. As that move failed, the Brown family sends Susan off to France. 

Thursday, March 3, 2022

Movie Review: How Green Was My Valley

How Green Was My Valley is a 1941 movie that was nominated for 10 Oscars and won 5 of them. One of those victories was for Best Picture where it beat out such movies as Citizen Kane, The Maltese Falcon, Sergeant York, and Suspicion. The film is about the Morgan family who work the coal mines in Wales. The story is occasionally narrated by the youngest son Huw (Roddy McDowall) -- perhaps a decade or two after the events of the movie. The movie starts off with a positive tone. The father and working age brothers are all employed at the mines. Wages are collected by the mother for the betterment of the family as a whole. And the eldest son, Ivor (Patric Knowles) gets married to Bronwyn (Anna Lee). At the same time, there appears to be the start of a romance between the sister, Angharad (Maureen O'Hara), and the new preacher, Mr. Gruffydd (Walter Pidgeon). 

That happiness doesn't last long. The mine owner cuts the wages due to what sounds like a recession. The workers go on strike. The father, Gwilym Morgan (Donald Crisp), opposes the strike and is ostracized by the community. The mother, Beth (Sara Allgood), and Huw fall into a frozen stream and suffer significant health consequences due to the exposure to the freezing temperatures. Angharad is courted by the mine owner's son and they marry -- even though she is still in love with the preacher. Ivor dies in a coal mining accident. Two of the other sons eventually get laid off from the mine and move to America. And as the movie ends, the father also dies in the mines.

Thursday, February 17, 2022

Movie Review: Journey to Italy

Journey to Italy stars Ingrid Bergman and George Sanders as a couple (Katherine Joyce and Alex Joyce) on their way to Italy to dispose of a property that was inherited after the death of an uncle. I believe the uncle was Katherine's. The movie starts off with the couple just 100 kilometers from Naples. Katherine is driving while Alex is taking a nap. They're driving in a rather fancy looking car and their cloths look high class (especially Katherine's). When Alex wakes up, he talks about his disappointment in not dealing with a business decision in a better way. Based on this, the immediate impression is that this is a wealthy couple. 

During the drive, they mention the names of two individuals. Initially, I thought it might be their children as they look like a couple who are in their late 30s to 40s, but I later learned that the two individuals mentioned are close friends. Also, they seem rather direct and formal with each other, but considering that they're British it just feels that this might be normal.

They randomly run into some friends at a stop and this is where relational troubles start to arise. While at dinner, the couple are separated at the table and Alex spends time flirting with a female friend. Katherine is very unhappy about this situation. In revenge, she later brings up the fact that while she was dating Alex, a poet friend had tried to pursue her. In fact, she tells Alex, the poet showed up outside her window just before she was to be married. This ploy of hers to make Alex jealous backfires and actually creates a rift between the two. 

As stated in the movie, the two of them had seldom spent time alone as a married couple. Instead, spending time with the two individuals mentioned earlier in the movie. After only a few days alone, they just find they can't get along with each other. In some ways, it is a wonder that they got married in the first place as their personal interests have no real intersection. Katherine finds excitement in visiting museums and historical sites. Alex finds excitement at bars and interactions with people. The wedge between them sends him looking into the possibility of having an affair.

As the wedge between them seems more like two roads diverging, Alex proposes that they just get a divorce. And yet, as the movie comes to a conclusion, Katherine finds herself separated from Alex during a religious town ceremony. She doesn't appear to be in any real danger so it seems more like she finds herself just not wanting to be separated from Alex. She calls out to him and he goes towards her. It is there that they realize that they do truly love each other.

The movie takes a glimpse into the life of a couple over a short period of time. One can see how this movie may have influenced Audrey Hepburn's "Two for the Road." That movie also deals with a well to do couple who are having relationship troubles that arise while they are on a trip. Is there potentially a hint that vacations cause family problems to arise? Actually, that can probably be seen in plenty of movies and in personal lives in general. Perhaps it even had an influence on a 1990s art movie called "Enchanted April."

I did enjoy the low key style of the movie and how it explored how a moment in time caused a relationship to rapidly fall apart. Yet, I question the happy ending of the movie. Was this a couple who really were in love? They just seem to have such diverse interests. Of course, maybe those interests only came to the surface due to the fact that they had plenty of free time. Perhaps one of the subtle points of the movie is that relationships aren't just built based on the two couples, but by the community and general time consuming moments that surrounds them -- be it the two friends that were missing or the work that occupied Alex's time.

The movie was initially released as "Viaggio in Italia," which explains the movie poster.

Thursday, January 27, 2022

Movie Review: The Razor's Edge (1946)

The Razor's Edge has a philosophical look at life. The movie opens up shortly after World War I has ended. America is filled with excitement. There is an understanding that we will become the greatest nation in the world. And, of course, since this movie was made in 1946, the outcome was already known to the audience watching this film. Larry Darrell (Tyrone Power) is a World War I veteran and is engaged to marry Isabel Bradley (Gene Tierney). Isabel's uncle, Elliott Templeton (Clifton Webb), is concerned about the future marriage, because Larry doesn't appear to have any motivation to take part in helping the United States fulfill it's destiny. Instead he wishes to "loaf" around for a period of time on his inheritance of $3,000 a year. Now $3,000 in today's terms is close to $47,000. I suppose depending on where one lives in the United States now this would be considered lower middle class or higher end poverty. We learn that this is also a concern of Isabel's. Larry and Isabel decide to postpone the marriage for a year, which will allow Larry to spend a year in Paris. 

There are some interesting dynamics here. Larry's life was saved by a friend. The friend sacrificed his life for Larry's during the war. This causes Larry to want to examine the meaning of one's life versus striving to make America a dominant country. He is willing to live a simplified life, perhaps eventually taking a low paid job to help better support his family. This clashes with Isabel and Elliot who are wealthy and can't imagine not living with such wealth. Another interesting point is that even though Isabel and Elliot are snobbish about money, it doesn't necessarily prevent them from associated with other classes of society. Somehow Larry and Isabel did meet and fall in love. Isabel also is friends with the Sophie and Bob MacDonald (Anne Baxter and Frank Latimore) who appear to have a middle class lifestyle. 

Thursday, December 23, 2021

Movie Review: To Live and Die in L.A.

To Live and Die in L.A. primarily occurs over a 42 day time period in Los Angeles. The movie starts off with the United States Secret Service protecting the president in Los Angeles. One of those agents, Richard Chance, notices a suspicious individual in a hotel. He chases after him and eventually tracks him down to the rooftop of the hotel. The individual is a suicide bomber, explosives wrapped around his chest. Also, climbing up to the rooftop from the floor below is Richard Chance's boss, Jimmy Hart. Jimmy Hart grabs the terrorist from behind and throws him off the roof. 

After that scene, we're introduced to Rick Masters who is a counterfeiter. He is in a warehouse, printing up fake $20 bills. We're introduced to a rather complex process and see how the bills are created from start to finish: from the drawing up of the bills to tossing the bills into a dryer to create a look of used bills.

We learn that Jimmy is just three days away from retirement, but has one last job to do. Another role of the Secret Service is to track down counterfeiting operations. He heads to the desert to track down Rick Masters. Somehow the Secret Service has figured out where the warehouse is. When he gets to the warehouse, he is shot dead. 

A few days later, Richard and team head to the warehouse and find Jimmy's body, dumped into a garbage container. All the equipment has already been moved out except for the dryer (which honestly seems odd). Richard than takes over as lead investigator to track down Rick Masters. He is given a new partner named John Vukovich.  

Thursday, October 14, 2021

Movie Review: Paths of Glory

Paths of Glory is a Stanley Kubrick film from 1957. The movie is about trench warfare between the Germans and French during World War I and the aftermath of one of those battles (both philosophical and reality). 

Spoilers: General Broulard (Adolphe Menjou) meets with his subordinate General Mireau (George Macready) inside a palatial home turned into headquarters. Broulard tells Mireau that the French want to capture a German position called the "Anthill." Mireau protests, saying that it isn't possible and that his men have already suffered significant casualties. Broulard states that if Mireau takes on this task and succeeds, he will be promoted to a two star general. This perks Mireau's interest and he changes his tune, saying that he believes it is possible to take the position.

Mireau goes to the trenches where we get to see the contrast of the living conditions between the generals and the other officers / enlisted troops. The generals get to spend their time in the palatial homes while everyone else is stuck in the mire. He heads over to Colonel Dax (Kirk Douglas) to tell him of the plan. Dax protests and Mireau threatens to put him on leave. Dax backs down and states that he will lead his men to battle.

That night, a scout team is sent out led by Lt. Roget (Wayne Morris). It includes two other individuals, one of them a Corporal Paris (Ralph Meeker). They make their way through the barbwire fencing. When they get closer to the German position the third individual is sent off to scout ahead. Roget panics when the individual doesn't return on a timely basis. He randomly throws a grenade and then takes off back to the French line. Paris doesn't want to leave the other man behind so goes off looking for him. He finds him dead, killed by the grenade. He then makes his way back to the French line where he finds Roget writing up a false report about how the situation played out.

Thursday, September 16, 2021

Movie Review: Paris, Texas

Paris, Texas is one of those art house movies that I love watching. There isn't any action scenes. It is a story about regrets and what could have been. And thoughts about what should be. 

The movie starts with Travis (Harry Dean Stanton) drinking the last drops of water from a gallon jug. He tosses the jug to the side. All you see is Texas desert. One might assume that he's going to die from dehydration out in this desert as there isn't any buildings or roads that one can see. He comes across a bar, grabs some ice cubes from a freezer, and then faints. He wakes up in a hospital, unable to speak. Via his belongings, the doctor is able to find a phone number and gives the phone number a call. The phone number is to Walt (Dean Stockton), Travis' brother, who lives in Los Angeles. Walt quickly flies out to Texas after telling his wife Anne (Aurore Clement). Anne asks what they should say to Hunter (Hunter Carson) -- someone we don't know anything about at this time. Walt tells Anne to let Hunter know that his father has come back onto the scene.

When Walt flies to Texas and locates Travis (who had decided to ramble off from the hospital), Travis is still unable to speak. But we slowly gain details about his life. He's been gone for about 4 years. Both he and his wife Jane (Nastassja Kinski) had just disappeared. Their son Hunter was just dropped off at the doorstep of Walt and Anne by, most likely, a third party when he was just 3. In fact, Walt and Anne had just assumed that Travis was dead and probably had told Hunter this fact. As time passed, the two of them treated Hunter as their own son and he started to call them mom and dad. At this point in time, Hunter is 7.

Thursday, July 15, 2021

Dr. Seuss Controversy: Should Movie Studios Cancel Certain Movies?

I think we all know about the controversy around Dr. Seuss that erupted in early March. The Dr. Seuss Enterprises decided to stop publishing 6 of his books for racial stereotypes. Conservatives erupted in protest. I listened to an hour long Youtube video about the controversy. People argued that cancel culture had gone too far.  

If this trend continues, at what point in time will it shift to other forms of entertainment such as movies? If Dr. Seuss Enterprises finds it necessary to stop publishing 6 books, will movie studios feel like they must take the next step and stop distribution of some of their movies. The most discussed movie (prior to Dr. Seuss) is Gone with the Wind for the false portrayal of slavery and stereotypes of Blacks. Eliminating that movie would be eliminating the largest domestic box office movie (on an inflation adjusted basis) a well as Clark Gable's and Vivien Leigh's most iconic roles.

Saturday, June 19, 2021

Movie Analysis: Elmer Gantry

This blog post will be discussing the ending of the movie.

Instead of calling this a movie review, I'm going to call this an analysis. The movie starts with Elmer Gantry (Burt Lancaster) in a speakeasy. It is Prohibition and alcohol can't legally be served. He's inside with his fellow salesmen. Though he talks a good game, we rather quickly learn that he isn't a very good one, barely making it through life financially. He spends his time making sales pitches and sleeping with women in various cities that he's met during his travels. 

In his travels, we quickly are met with two versions of Elmer Gantry and his relationship with Jesus and Christianity. At the speakeasy, what looks like Salvation Army volunteers enter and ask for donations. No one wishes to donate. Elmer gets up and asks the customers that they reconsider and make donations. He does so with a perfect sales pitch, but you have to wonder if he is simply mocking the Salvation Army volunteers. Off he goes to another city and drops by an African American church. He is the only white person in the church and he joins the singing with great gusto. By the faces of those in the church, you can tell that they think that he might be there as a joke. Yet, his enthusiasm wins them over. As he is a bit down on his luck, the pastor of the church actually gives him a job to earn a little money to help him on his way as well as providing him with lunch.

Saturday, June 12, 2021

Movie Review: Ace in the Hole

Ace in the Hole is a 1951 movie directed by Billy Wilder. He is known for such movies as Double Indemnity, Sunset Blvd., Sabrina, The Seven Year Itch and Some Like It Hot just to name a few. The movie stars Kirk Douglas. 

The movie opens with Chuck Tatum (Kirk Douglas) sitting in his car. It is being towed through the city of Albuquerque. Seeing a newspaper office, he tells the tow driver to stop and he walks into the office to see if there is a job opening. We learn that Tatum has been fired as a journalist from various big city newspapers from New York to Detroit for various infractions even though he often wrote front page articles. Even with that hiring/firing background, the newspaper decides to hire him on the spot. 

Tuesday, May 4, 2021

Movie Review: Jezebel

Jezebel is about Julie Marsden (Bette Davis) who is engaged to Preston Dillard (Henry Fonda). She is a spoiled, wealthy young woman (perhaps a teenager), living in 1852 New Orleans. From the take of things, she is an orphan as she lives with her Aunt. She is spoiled, but also complex. She definitely has an adventurous side as her first appearance on screen is her riding a horse that will only obey her commands. She is late to her own party and has little regard for tradition. She walks into her own party in riding cloths while everyone else is dressed for a Southern party. And when it comes to Preston, she wants to make sure she has him around her finger. The two of them are supposed to go to a fitting for the Olympus Ball, but he is busy in a bank meeting. She walks right into the bank (which based on the looks of the customers is taboo) and demands that Preston come and talk to her. He does, but tells her that he simply can't go with her. In a bit of fury, she goes to the fitting and instead of buying the traditional white dress, she goes with a red dress. 

Her family as well as Preston are shocked that she wants to wear a red dress to the Olympus Ball, but she insists that she wishes to go in red. When they arrive at the ballroom, the crowd immediately rejects the couple. When on the dance floor, they are soon left alone as the rest of the couples move to the side. Julie sees that she's made a serious blunder and begs Preston to take her home, but he refuses, figuring -- I suppose -- that this is a way to teach Julie to be less spoiled. The Olympus Ball is more than just a social blunder, it also ends the engagement. 

Preston moves to the North (business related to the bank) and Julie remains secluded in her home, avoiding all contact. The movie shifts to 1853 and there is the start of a Yellow Fever outbreak. Julie and her aunt move to Halcyon Plantation, which seems to be her property via her deceased parents. Preston also returns to the city and a homecoming party is set at Halcyon Planation. A group of friends show up, including Buck Cantrell (George Brent) who is a rejected suiter of Julie's. The reason for the party goes beyond a homecoming. It is meant as a way for Julie to win back Preston's heart. Unknown to her, Preston got married and he brings his wife, Amy (Margaret Lindsay) to the party. 

Saturday, October 24, 2020

Movie Review: The Godfather: Part III

I finally caught The Godfather: Part III while doing a marathon viewing of the three films. What a disaster. It really started from the very beginning of the film. Don Michael Corleone (Al Pacino) is reflecting about his life at his Lake Tahoe compound where so much occurred during The Godfather: Part II such as the First Communion party for his son and where he had his brother Fredo murdered. The compound is not only abandoned, but also in a state of disrepair. 

During his reflections, Michael reflects on a conversation with his girlfriend Kay Adams Michelson (Diane Keaton). In that conversation, he tells her how his father got singer Johnny Fontane out of a music contract. He mentions how his father not only got Fontane out of the contract, but also a $1,000 check. Then the next scene has a Hollywood director waking up to a horse head in his bed. Well, those of us who watched the first movie know that the horse head was a result of getting Fontane a role in a movie and not about the music contract. Fail.

After his reflections, we see that Michael writes a letter to his children Anthony (Franc D'Ambrosio) and Mary (Sofia Coppola) in an attempt to reconcile. He apparently did as we next see him in New York, receiving a papal order for his charitable donations which are in the millions. So back to my first paragraph, he let's his compound fall into disrepair, but yet he has the ability to donate millions to the church? The start of the movie has you thinking that Michael has fallen on hard times. Maybe his casino investments went south? But no, he's a very wealthy individual. Okay, maybe that whole scene of a rundown compound was meant as an analogy of his family life and in a way foreshadowed the future, but to me I just don't see Michael allowing that spot to go to ruin like that. Just doesn't seem to be his personality.

After receiving his papal order, there is an after party. There, we meet a wannabe mobster, Vincent Mancini (Andy Garcia). He is the illegitimate son of Michael's brother Sonny (died in the first movie). We learn that Michael doesn't even have him on the guest list though he is recognized by someone at the party and is allowed into the event. Like Sonny, Vincent is a man of action versus a strategist like Michael. This is important point on another failing of the movie.

Anyways, another moment at the party has Anthony going to see his father and telling him that he is dropping out of law school to pursue opera. Michael disapproves, but is convinced by Kay to allow Anthony to drop out of school. At the same time, Michael intervenes in a dispute between Vincent and another mafia leader named Joey Zasa (Joe Mantegna). Vincent shows his violence by attacking Joey after a deal has been struck. For some reason, Michael still brings Vincent into the fold. Okay, so Michael doesn't put him on the invite list. Understands that he has qualities similar to what got Sonny killed. And yet he brings him into the fold? Makes no sense.

The middle part of the film revolves on Michael's attempt to shift his money from the casino business to a company called Immobiliare. From how it is explained, it sounds like it is the largest property REIT in Europe. The reason he targets a European company versus a US based one is because the property is owed by the Catholic Church and he knows that the Vatican Bank has financial issues. So Michael is on his way from shifting from pure mafia activity to the casino business (partially out of the mafia) to a REIT. This is something he's tried to do since the first movie and something he had long promised his family. Yet, he gets pulled back into the world of the mafia, because the other mafia leaders aren't happy that he isn't helping them move out of the business. Okay, so seriously, these leaders can't figure out a way to get out of the mafia world on their own? 

Anyways, Michael sets up a meeting with these leaders. Joey Zasa is also invited. Michael gives enormous amounts of money to everyone (based on their investments in the casinos) except for Joey. Wait, why would a strategic Michael do this? He both invites Joey to the meeting and then embarrasses him by not proving him with anything? Even if Joey had little involvement in the casino business, would Michael really do this?

Joey leaves in anger. Within minutes, a helicopter outfitted with a machine gun (or two) blasts the meeting room. Michael and Vincent barely escape, but most everyone else is killed. Shortly thereafter, Michael suffers a diabetic stroke. While he recuperates, Vincent takes action against Joey and kills him. When Michael (who is slowly gaining back his health) learns about this, he grows very angry. He tells Vincent that Joey was not the brains behind what had happened and that they shouldn't have taken that action until figuring out how to deal with the real brains behind the attack. This is the second time Vincent has taken action when cautious strategic thinking would have been better. Okay, so what if Joey had gotten paid out, would he still have shot up the meeting room? 

The family then heads to Italy where Anthony is the lead singer in an opera. Okay, I don't know much about opera, but someone who no doubt spent hours studying hard in undergrad in order to get into law school was able to become a top professional opera singer? Doesn't opera singing take years of training? I guess not.

While in Europe, intrigue comes about regarding the mafia, the Catholic Church and Immobiliare. By this time, Michael looks to be not at full health, but does appear to have gotten his mental capacity back. He is able to maneuver strategically through the intrigue and is able to secure the deal. He has finally succeeded in what he has desired. He's gotten his family out of the mafia business.

But perhaps he has let his guard down. For some reason, he puts Vincent in charge of the mafia side of the business. Now why exactly would Michael put Vincent in charge of the family business? Maybe Michael notices something in Vincent that I don't think anyone watching the movie notices? To me, Vincent is still a bit of a hothead. He hasn't really shown any ability to think strategically. He only is able to follow through with the tactics that Michael gives him. Basically, during this whole time, Michael asks Vincent to become a double agent. All I see is Vincent being able to provide useful info on the interactions.

In a repeat of what happened in the first two movies, with all the chess pieces figures out, Michael/Vincent enact their long game strategy of taking out their enemies. Sorry, this just seems like a repeat of the first two movies and very repetitive. 

Anyways, the above are the reasons why I find this movie a waste of time.

What I did really enjoy: I honestly think the last few minutes is awesome. It finally answers if Michael was ever able to keep his word about getting his family out of the mafia business.

Also, I do remember that Sofia Coppola got a lot of criticism for her acting. Honestly, it wasn't brilliant, but it was solid. I think she got better as the movie progressed. I think her last scene was brilliant.




 

Tuesday, September 29, 2020

Movie Review: The Searchers (a John Wayne movie)

I recently saw The Searchers on TMC. John Wayne plays the lead character Ethan Edwards while Natalie Wood has some brief scenes as an older version of Debbie Edwards. The director is John Ford.

The movie starts out with Ethan Edwards (John Wayne) coming to visit his brother in Texas. He is a Civil War veteran who fought for the Confederacy. The war had actually ended three years prior and there were rumors that he had traveled to California during that time frame, but he denies it. Whatever he did, he seems to have done decently okay for himself as he provides his brother payment for temporary shelter. The next day, Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton (Ward Bond) comes to the house. Cattle was stolen from a nearby ranch and a posse is being put together to chase down the thieves. Ethan goes with the group while his brother and most of the family stays behind. After going a distance on horseback, they come upon the cattle - they're all dead. They quickly realize that a group of Comanches has set a trap where they've gotten a group of armed men to leave their homesteads, which would leave their places wide open for attack.

The groups split in two with one group riding to one location while the other group goes back to the Edwards location. By the time one of the groups gets back to the Edwards homestead, it is too late. The place is burned down and most of the family has been killed. The two young girls, Ethan's nieces, appear to have been abducted: Debbie and Lucy. The two groups re-form and ride off to try and rescue the girls. They come across the Comanche warriors and are outnumbers by about 2 to 1. The group is able to find protective cover with the use of a river as defense and survive the attack. Due to the fact that they don't have the necessary military advantage, the group makes the determination that they simply can't rescue the two girls. 

Thursday, January 2, 2020

Little Women: White Privilege?

Of the potential Oscar Best Picture movies that I've seen so far, Little Women is my favorite. It replaces Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. (The one movie I haven't seen yet is 1917 so my opinion might shift again.) There was a tenderness in that family that I just loved. The movie had me wanting to be part of that family.

Yet, in this "woke" era that we live in, I couldn't help but think of how one could interpret this movie. One way to view this film is from the lens of the post/current #metoo movement. Another view that I thought about was the idea of white privilege.

(Note: the following is based on what I saw in the film and doesn't include source material that might provide additional context on the life of the March family.)

The film is set largely among the wealthy. Yes, the March family throughout much of the film is not wealthy, but I would argue the family does come from wealth. Aunt March mentions this to Jo early in the movie. She mentions that she is wealthy and that Jo's father and mother lost their money. (I forget the exact wording used.) This surely implies that Jo's grandparents had been well off and set both Aunt March and Father March off well in life. Now it isn't because Jo's parents lost their money due to gambling, alcohol, and bad investments. It can be argued that the family lost their money doing charity work during the Civil War.